Friday, January 23, 2015

The Other Side of Fog-Driving



—I wrote this in October; I wrote it on the day that I quit my job and decided, after months of prayer, to move for the third time this year. Jobless, soon to be homeless, and praying for finances to enter a graduate program, I came home after my last day at work and jotted down the following revelation.—

I pulled out from my house squinting through freshly squee-geed spaces on my windows this grey morning, thick with fog. As I drove, I managed to pull up some music on my phone while I waited at a red light (Calm down; I wasn’t using my phone at a green one). I chose Rend Collective Experiment’s “Immeasurably More” from their latest album, which I first heard only recently. I listened to the words, growing more awake not so much with every mile I drove but with every verse I sang: “More than all we ask, than all we seek / All our hopes and dreams / You are immeasurably more / Than we can know / Than we can pray / All our words can say / You are immeasurably more.”

The instrumental portion of the song allotted me time to think. And I was met with the gravity of Who I am dealing with.

And then it was one of those rare moments when nature synced with media as the song lyrics boomed back into a tagline at the same instant the fog lifted and the sun burst through, revealing a clear, blindingly-bright road that stretched straight on ahead for miles: “No eye has seen, no hear has heard / What is coming, what is coming / Never-ending joy, never-failing love / You are coming, You are coming.” I gasped and laughed out loud at the timing. And the meaning behind it. 




No one knows what’s behind the fog. What’s about to burst through.

When I say “yes” to the Lord of the Universe, I am allowing Him to unleash a power in my life that is beyond all human limits.

I couldn’t stop smiling, and I couldn’t sing the words because I was laughing with the joy my realization brought me. 

And then I realized that freedom was spreading out down the road and across the horizon for me. What a life—to be able to walk into an unmeasurable, unknown fullness and know that I’m being carried along in its current. What a life—to not worry about trying to put down the stakes of my own happiness, to not be fearfully burdened for the day they are uprooted because I didn’t plant them down deep enough or see far enough ahead. Oh, to not spend life in increments or getting by until another milestone comes to pass. What a life—to exist in wide-open expanse, to equate knowledge with rest, and to rest knowing that to hug this livelong day as tightly as I can is actually to open my arms wide to the future. Not to cease hoping, but to cease wishing. Not to cease progressing, but to cease striving. 

Because all at once, when we loosen our grasp on our future and let ourselves drop, we realize that the Arms to catch us were already closer than a breath. We realize that things become clearer, brighter, sharper when we surrender control and, in turn, gain the sense of it that we sought in vain.

Because all of a sudden, abandoning my own self-contrived limits of comfort became very tantalizing. And something—no, everything—about stepping into God’s unknown seemed less like stepping into a fog and more like shooting into a clear sky.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


And in the two months following that morning of revelation, I was hit with one miracle after another: a job. A home. A degree program. And I realized that I was standing on the other side of the fog. 

And now, three months later, I realize that though I'm through the fog, I don't know all that's going to burst through. Enter 2015. The year of Missouri, of seminary, of Eurasia Community. The year of immeasurably more.   

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Under-Appreciated Landscaper

Elementary school science classes:
The water cycle, model volcanoes, and worksheets. Mounds and mounds of worksheets.

Although I grew to understand and appreciate science later in life, K-6 science was inundated with worksheets. Hands-on projects were for the “big kids” in middle- and high school. Except that one time we used live worms in fourth grade to diagram their anatomy, and I grabbed a paper bag and faked hyperventilation so I wouldn’t be forced to touch any of their slimy, writhing bodies. 
It worked.

But out of all the stacks of science worksheets comprising my first years in public education, what has stuck with me over the years are the two general categories of trees: deciduous and coniferous.

For some reason, those hefty, awkward words nestled snugly in my ten-year-old brain, even though I couldn’t pronounce them at the time, and never left.

Deciduous trees have leaves, and coniferous trees don’t. They have needles.

I think we all know that, but sometimes we forget the words describing leafy trees and needly ones. And for the past fourteen years—even last week—I’ve dispensed my highly technical biological lingo wherever I've gone to young and old alike. 

Now, these terms have never actually proven useful in my life, but one of my bucket list items is to be on Jeopardy someday.

And I was at peace with how I was impacting the world in this way until my parents called last weekend.

While driving through northwest Montana, they called me. “Renée! Fall is beautiful out here! The pine trees are a gorgeous yellow!”

Yellow?

“No, no, those aren’t pine trees. They can’t be. They’re some other kind of deciduous tree. You know, because deciduous trees lose their leaves and--" 

“No, they are pine trees! No leaves here!”

I was confused. I thought they were confused. Because, of course, everyone knows that leaves change colors, and leaves are on deciduous trees, not on conifers. Needles can’t change colors. That’s kind of the meaning of the word evergreen. 

“I think it’s a tamarack,” my parents mused. They insisted, so I Googled.

And I sat dumbfounded. Image after image of yellow pine trees filled up my phone’s screen. I scrolled desperately through the websites, hoping that I had typed “tamarack” incorrectly or that it was just a bad joke. Then I saw phrases like “actually do change color in fall” and “one of few conifers which do so” and “under-appreciated landscape tree.”




The one piece of knowledge I had retained from years of elementary science: shattered.

The killer was when I read the term deciduous conifer.

What a contradiction in terms: here’s a pine that acts like some leaf bush and sheds its needles. The only distinguishing mark of each type of tree, and here they are, meshed together in a tamarack! 

I’m only a little perturbed.

The very thing that made those terms easy to remember for me was that they represented such differences.

They’re clear. They’re distinct. If you have one, you don’t have the other.

At least that’s what I thought. Oh, those terms still hold, but what do you do with contradictions? With exceptions? How can something that’s classified one way retain properties of its opposite?

The day I received my myth-debunking phone call (arboreally speaking) from my parents was the day before I saw tamaracks for myself in living color. That’s because I joined them on the drive back to Montana to start another segment of my life. 

Now, the embarrassing part of all this is that I’m actually from Montana. But in my defense, tamaracks don’t grow in my region; they only grow in the northwest parts (and Canada and Alaska and in most northern states…), and they only change color in the fall, and I’ve never traveled abroad in the Big Sky State in autumn because I’ve generally been in school at this time of year. Upon further research, I found that cities in Montana actually hold tamarack festivals every fall to celebrate the beauty of these colorful pines. Not that you have to hold that over my head; please don’t. 

And as I drove, the brilliant gold of the tamaracks was sometimes so bright that I thought the sun was shining on the mountains ahead; but when I looked at the sky, it was still a dense, foggy gray. 

I smiled and shook my head. How? And why?

I’ve been asking those two questions about life recently. Beyond pine forests, I’ve had some conifer-turned-deciduous situations come to the forefront of my life. Situations running rife with contradictions. 

And they may not be real “contradictions” in the sense that contradictions lead to a faulty conclusion or cancel each other out; but I’ve seen the unexpected come up, and I’ve seen opposites co-exist in uncomfortable ways.

I thought that if a tree was a conifer, it was impossible for that tree to change colors.
I thought that if a relationship had Godly beginnings, it could only lead to marriage.
I thought that if I am called to a life of missions, it would mean entering the mission field and never leaving.

The pine trees of my life have been shedding their needles left and right.

Yeah, maybe I’ve got some elementary-school thinking still straggling along in my brain. 

I had all these end-goals in mind, and I assumed that fairly direct paths led to them.
And yet, how many situations do we apply similar thinking to? 
Because I perceive [this or that] to be God’s will for my life, there should be no detours until I get there.
And if there are detours, we have a tendency to assume something is wrong. Because after all, contradictions can’t co-exist, can they?

What started out as a tree-observation turned into meaningful soul-searching for me as I drove. And my 12-hour drive afforded me time to think.

I thought about the book of Ezekiel. I’ve been studying it recently, and more than any other prophetic book in the Old Testament, it’s always made me raise the question, “Why?” 
From the words of God to the demands placed on Ezekiel to the actions of the people, I’ve often thought that the book of Ezekiel appears contradictory at worst, unexpected at best. 

Starting in the late 500s BC, God allowed about 10,000 Jews, including the prophet, to be exiled to Babylon more for spiritual rebellion than political rebellion, although both were present. 

For twenty-two years, Ezekiel demonstrated a series of extreme, symbolic acts to show the Israelites God’s intentions for dealing with them, starting with the unalterable fact that God’s judgment was coming. 

Acts like reconstructing a model of Jerusalem on a clay brick (4:1-3). Lying on one side of his body for inordinate amounts of time (4:4-8). Eating a vegetarian’s diet (4:9-17). Cutting off his hair from head and beard and burning it, slashing it with a sword, and scattering it to the wind (5:1-4).

And then the symbolic went to the literal (while still retaining symbolic value). God told Ezekiel that He would take away Ezekiel’s wife, and that Ezekiel was not permitted to mourn or show any grief (24:15-27).

Wasn’t this last act, two years before the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem, intense enough to spark a change of heart in the Israelites? Shouldn’t such an act deter, rather than lead to, impending judgment?

Ezekiel was unquestionably righteous and divinely called of God for his prophetic ministry at a crucial and devastating time in Israel’s history; shouldn’t he have been spared from such adverse situations?

I’ve raised the why? question numerous times while reading the Ezekiel, but it wasn’t until the tamarack-thick drive that I noticed a commonality in the why-questions I’m currently asking:
They’re all people-centered.
From trees to life goals to exiled Israelites, what I mean is that these questions are generated when I focus on the situations rather than the orchestrator of the situations:

Why is it that opposite characteristics can coexist in a tree? Why is it that my goals aren’t being achieved according to the timeline I constructed? Why is it that Ezekiel had to live such a profoundly extreme lifestyle?

The answer to these whys is found in the book of Ezekiel.

Nowhere else in Scripture is the phrase, “then they will know that I am the Lord” so predominant, so repetitive, as in Ezekiel. Sixty-five times that phrase or a variant of it appears in his book. 

The theme of the sovereignty of God echoes over all the chapters of Ezekiel, through the crushing blows to the temple, through the oracles of judgment against Israel and its enemy nations, and through the hope-drenched visions of a restored Jerusalem and temple. God’s sovereignty pervades everything in and beyond the sphere of human existence.

The Lord, through Ezekiel, says over and over, “I’m not doing this for your sake, Israelites; I’m doing it for mine. I’m doing it so that you and all the nations around you know that I am the one true God.” 

And what was He doing? Destroying and restoring. Opposites. But both were necessary to assert His superiority over the deities of the pagan nations, to prove His faithfulness to His covenant people, and to demonstrate His sovereignty. A sovereignty that transcends cultural mores and and group-think and standards of what is right and what signifies blessings. 

The exile of God’s people to Babylon, the destruction of the temple—these weren’t just about those people living at that time. It wasn’t even just about God’s people for all time, the universal Church: it was about God Himself.

God’s plan for His people-turned-exiles was to endure punishments and, later, experience restoration, not because of the people they were as much as because He was demonstrating His character. Not exactly what the people had in mind when they felt the weight of God’s hand in judgment on their lives, I’m sure.

He also has more in mind for our lives—what happens and where, what dies and what lives, what changes and what stays. And even though it may appear contradictory or not conducive to the goals we have for ourselves, we would do well to remember that God has other and greater purposes for our lives than we do. 

We may enter into something with a desired outcome, thinking that God couldn't possibly have something different in mind; but when the actual outcome is different from our desire, our gut reaction shouldn’t be to surmise that it could not have been the will of God. That something’s not adding up.

Oh, but it is. And it’s adding up on God’s calculator, not on ours, because He calculates from infinity while we fumble with about as many numbers as we have fingers. He’s calculating with variables taken from the entire scope of human history, and all that’s within our reach to manipulate is our present—not even our own past or future. He’s doing more than we can see. Even when we think that where we currently find ourselves couldn’t possibly be what God had in mind.

What I've noticed in Scripture, and in my own life, is that God often shares an end-result (such as the future restoration of Israel) but doesn't divulge all the steps leading up to it.

When things go differently than we planned, as sons and daughters of God we can remember that God’s purposes are different than and higher than ours. And they involve more than just us personally. What a comforting thought as we weave the seeming inconsistencies into a cohesive whole. And it's not just a feel-good wish; it's fact based on the principle that God will act in the best interest of His children because He is sovereign.

*  * *

I’ve taken a liking to tamarack trees since this weekend. No longer do I bristle at the fact that they are a contradiction in terms, a disappointer of studious children. I see them more as a reminder of the sovereignty of the God who splashes uncharacteristic splotches of color over my life when I think everything should be hued and ordered in a dull green tint.

So, never under-appreciate a landscape tree. Or the seeming contradictions in your life.





Watching pine trees lose their needles—and being okay with it—

Renée

Monday, July 21, 2014

Loud-Shoed Land Swimmer


Now is as good a time as any to shed secrets: I can’t swim.

But for the past two years, I’ve taken up swimming.

What?

Oh, not the traditional kind. I swim on land. I swim on hard surfaces, although I prefer carpet to wood. These surfaces are floors. Specifically, the floors of the bedrooms I’ve had during the last twenty-four months. And whether it’s backstroke, butterfly stroke, or doggie paddling, I’m swimming around a little more than water buoys:

I’m swimming around shoes. 

Shoes. 

My favorite necessity (note: not accessory!), the joy of my wardrobe, the bane of my organization attempts. Because when you have as many shoes as there are years in a centennial celebration, there’s simply nowhere convenient for them to fit in One. Tiny. Bedroom. 

And in the past two years, when I moved from college to home, from home to Moldova, from Moldova back to home, from home to Russia, from Russia back to home, and from home to Washington (new home), a massive pile of shoes appeared on each of my bedroom floors. This is because I’m an out-of-sight-out-of-mind person, so if I don’t see all my shoes, I may forget to pack necessary ones, and then I’ll get to a new location, put together an outfit, and realize I don’t have any shoes to go with it, so I’ll have to buy some. Not that that’s ever happened before. Enter the Renée-versus-shoes swim race.

It’s all just a money-saving move, really.

Allowed to take only two suitcases to Moldova for a year, I could bring few pairs of shoes (note: actual number not relevant). Before packing, I called my missionary mentors to ask what types of shoes were most useful. “Boots,” they responded. “Eastern Europeans love their boots.” I inserted a few into each suitcase, along with a medley of other shoe types, and arrived in Moldova only to find that most of the shoes I brought, I didn’t wear: boots were indeed king. 

When I packed for Russia, I packed smarter: nearly all boots that time. Boots of different lengths and colors and linings for all seasons. Russia is cold, I reasoned. I’ll wear boots all year. No wasted suitcase space.

But I forgot that I would be flying to Russia in August. 

Which, in the northern hemisphere, is a summer month. Even in Russia. 

My first day in Russia was a sunny Saturday, and I donned dark brown, ankle-length boots to go grocery shopping. My fashion was high. So was my heat-index. 

When my other team members arrived in Russia, they asked me, “Why are you wearing boots in summer?”

“Because you told me Eastern Europe was a boot culture!”

“Yeah, but not in summer!”

And then I looked around at the Russian women, and they were all clad in Roman sandals and wedge shoes.

Grrr.



  •         -          -          -          -          -          -

Not only did my shoes warm my feet and I trudged through the streets; they also announced my presence to all who were within a 2-block radius of me.

You see, the boots I have aren’t fur-coated, soft-treading cozies. They are pointy-toed, silver-buckled, high-zippered, solid-heeled boots. And them thangs get loud.

Which is amplified when one is the only one on the streets wearing close-toed shoes.

Granted, other summery high-heels and even some flats can give off sound, but there’s something about the wide, solid base of a boot that gives a satisfying, hearty click which resonates a little more than the crackle of a stiletto. 

What I’m saying is that every time I went down the street, people heard me coming.

Embarrassing when I’d walk to the bathroom in high school between classes, but not so in Russia.

Well, maybe at first.

I was shocked to so often hear the chatter of my feet, and I mentioned it to my roommate. “Sometimes I’m self-conscious because when I walk, I’m turning heads everywhere I go,” I laughed, bashful with recent memories. “Well, you just have to own it! If you don’t want to be heard, wear a tennis shoe. But if you’re going to wear boots, you have to own that click!” 

Good point. 

I could tread timidly, be heard, and cringe inwardly (and cave and wear less fashionable shoes and breathe easy because I could finally have silent feet), or I could keep going and walk like I meant it. 

And when I thought about it that way, I realized that the cursed sound actually functioned as a blessed alert. 

What?

You see, in Russia, I often walked alone. I commuted to school, went to church, shopped, and traveled to meetings alone. At nearly all hours of the day and night. Equipped with a cellphone, map, limited knowledge of the Russian language, and a fair-to-middling memory, I navigated the streets by myself. 

In Russia I had to do things and go places at times of the day considered “unsafe” in my hometown in America; add on top of that a different country, unknown culture, and foreign language, and then put me in locations where the only option is to travel alone: that describes my first few months in Russia. 

Fueled by prayers and established in the knowledge of the Lord’s provision, I didn’t look for ways to minimize my time outside the doors of my apartment. I knew that God equips those He calls, and I knew I was called to Russia at that time, even if I had to walk alone.

And that knowledge, paired with the afterglow of my roommate’s words, caused me to look at boot-clicks in a new light. 

My first apartment was a good 15 minutes from access to the metro (subway) system, and walking home through dark, winding, silent streets with loud boots beating the sidewalk at a confident pace told anyone nearby that someone with purpose was coming. Navigating to a college campus in an ethnically-charged area of the city, I turned heads with my stomp as I walked on dirt paths and through iron gateways. Running toward the river to a friend’s house in the middle of the night because she needed help alerted people on the street to, well, get out of the way, because snowboot-girl was powering through with her tread.

I began to “own the click.” If nothing else, the sound let people know that the street was not empty and that a quick-paced human was coming their way. And to me, that sounds safer than creeping soft-soled around the corner and taking people by surprise.

I began to see—and hear—my boots as a blessing: In a sense, they kept me safe. Or at least safe-er.

They reminded me that I never walked alone.

I know as well as anyone else that I am no match for the streets of Russia. Or Butte, America. Or anywhere, for that matter. I need a little—or a lot—of aid in order to make it. I’ve since wondered if the clicking gave me confidence or if I put the confidence in my clicking. Either way, it reminded me that just as the shoes helped me stand out, the Lord helped me stand strong. I think of Habakkuk’s prayer in chapter 3 of his book which ends with an expression of trust: “God, the Lord, is my strength. He makes my feet like the deer’s; He makes me tread on my high places” (v. 19). “He makes my feet like the deer’s” can be translated as “He gives me sure-footed confidence.” 

So, our strength-giving God puts us on rugged terrain, makes our feet strong, and gives us confidence to believe it. 

To use the shoe-metaphor, He gives us both the click in our boots and the confidence to own our walk. 

It wasn’t until I began to take psychological ownership of the click my shoes were making that I realized how providential the sound was, and how it pointed to the real reason I tread my Russian heights in safety. 

The more my shoes clicked on through the months, the more I realized that my protection came less from what was on my feet and more from what was in them—and in my whole body: The indwelling God of strength Himself.

And He treads on high places, too.

Before the prophet Habakkuk’s time, the prophet Micah spoke to God’s people, and one of his themes was deliverance by God. In the first chapter of his book, he describes the Lord as “coming…down [out of His place to] tread upon the high places of the earth” (v. 3). God never asks us to do something He hasn’t done Himself.

Whatever your high place—whether a literal dark street or a sense of intense isolation or pressure to make decisions while feeling directionless or just the wearing grind of daily life—the strength-God has given you the shoes you need for this part of your life. All you have to do is put them on and walk—walk loudly, knowing that they won’t fail you. It’s yours for the believing.

-          -          -          -          -          -

You may be relieved to know that as Russia’s winter months gave way to spring, I did purchase some quiet-soled sandals and trod the sidewalks in seasonally appropriate footwear.

But in my spirit, I was still loud-shoed.



Moral of the story: Wear boots. Lots of them. Loud ones.

Or maybe just on the inside. 

Still stomping,
Renée




Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Surprised by Consistency



I felt it creep over me as I graded assignments in my apartment last month on a Tuesday afternoon. It had come upon me unaware the previous day, too, as I rode a marshrutka home. On and off for 48 hours, spurts of it siezed me unaware, seeped through my skin and lifted my spirits so unexpectedly that I wasn't sure what overtook me.

It was a fleeting, almost tangible sensation, akin to what C. S. Lewis described in his book Surprised by Joy: it “
suddenly arose [.] […]It was a sensation, of course, of desire; but desire for what? […] Before I knew what I desired, the desire itself was gone, the whole glimpse…withdrawn, the world turned commonplace again, or only stirred by a longing for the longing that had just ceased” (Lewis).

But this wasn’t joy, strictly speaking. It was something faintly familiar that I couldn’t recall. I remembered hearing a word for it months ago in America, remembered this word being widely circulated in the States.

As I pondered, I squinted my eyes, but not because of deep thought. It was because I couldn’t see due to something bright shining on my retinas. And then it hit me:

Sun

That was the word for it: sun.

That’s what they called it in the old country, in Big Sky Country where I didn’t own an umbrella or pair of galoshes. That’s what would wake me up on summer mornings and hang in the sky until 9 at night.

Sun.
 
 
I never knew the power that sunbeams have to involuntarily upturn the corners of my mouth until I began living in a place that has less than 6 hours of daylight at the height of winter.

I know that Earth’s poles are inhabitable because of their 6 months of constant darkness and 6 months of light, and I had heard of places near the top of the world and near the bottom of it which are slightly less extreme, but I didn’t really think that living anywhere would be too difficult with 21st-century technology and conveniences. All the talk I’d heard about the adverse health effects of low sunlight intake didn’t really take effect because I’d grown up sun-drenched in a semi-arid climate. But this winter when I’d look out the window while teaching and notice that the street lights didn’t shut off until after 11 AM, I began re-thinking the importance of the sun. In a place where people buy sun lamps and take Vitamin D supplements, I began looking into the details of the sun’s importance to biological processes.

Technically, Vitamin D is already present in the skin, but the energy in sunlight converts it into a form our bodies can use. This chemical form is transported to the liver and kidneys where it joins to hydrogen and oxygen molecules and can then increase the body’s absorption of calcium, even doubling the amount of calcium the body can absorb without the necessary levels of Vitamin D.

But calcium doesn’t only protect bones. Vitamin D receptors are also found in the heart, endocrine glands, and blood vessels, meaning that they as well as numerous other tissues and organs need Vitamin D for optimal functioning.

One day this fall, as light waned and I became victim to the uncontrollably shortening day, I consoled myself with the realization that after December 21, the days will only get longer.
Then I checked how many more hours of sunlight would be available each day after December 21, and the results were heartening:


Not.
The length of sunlight increased the following day, December 22nd, by a generous 2 (that’s t-w-o) seconds.
Wow.

 According to health.harvard.edu, “people who live at latitudes above 37 degrees north or below 37 degrees south of the equator don’t get enough UVB energy from the sun to make all the vitamin D they need” (2007).

Saint Petersburg sits at 59.95° north latitude.

Of course, it’s possible to get “too much sun,” and it’s detrimental when you don’t get enough. Regardless of latitude lines, most doctors encourage people to get their recommended amounts of Vitamin D via daily multivitamins (Harvard Health, 2007). The key is consistency.

Consistency.

One day of freakishly prolonged sunshine this week would not make up for the months I’ve spent pale-ing my legs.

Something like looking out the window (or looking at my legs) makes me realize that what I had previously taken for granted—sunlight—is not an option.

But it’s not an ignorance or ungratefulness that is the true danger. The real dangers lie in not realizing what’s necessary and not taking it in on a consistent basis.

This is true for any good thing: Vitamin D. Friendship. Dark green leafy vegetables.

While the road to hell is paved with good intentions, the road to health is paved with consistency.  I can mean to get enough of what I need, but if I don’t get enough of it, then I’ll suffer.

My personality type is one that prefers—thrives on—spontaneity. I guess the fact that I transplanted from Montana to Missouri to Moldova to Russia is one evidence of that fact. I love following winding paths, trying unusual food, and experimenting with new methods for timeworn processes. And because I am enlivened by change and variation, I have to make an effort to be consistent in the things that are essential for all types of health.

I’m never surprised by consistency. I’m bored by it. I hate hearing the same story twice, let alone re-telling one. I make efforts to avoid eating the same food for days in a row. And I may or may not try to paint my nails a different color each week. But I’m surprised to find that consistency doesn’t always squelch opportunities for change; rather, it can prime us for them.

Dwelling in the land of winter darkness has been a living sermon for me.

Maybe you, like me, could use a little more consistency in your life.

We must be consistent about taking in adequate amounts of Vitamin D, lest our bodies eventually suffer long-term effects.

I must be consistent about living missionally, lest I slip into living in a foreign country as a tourist instead of a minister.

We must be consistent about living up to the vision God has given us, lest we go on auto pilot and operate out of a sense of duty or plow through life driven by desires.

First John 2 explains that the mark of a Christian is consistency in modeling the life of Christ: “By this we know that we are in Him: the one who says he abides in Him ought himself to walk in the same manner as He walked” (1 John 2:5b-6). This is not a walk we make once; it’s an ongoing trodding.

God didn’t design us to be good to go after getting filled once and for all. Christianity is not a one-time event, a one-stop shop, or an experience. It is a lifestyle, a daily path, an ongoing journey.

Are we afraid God will run out? That He'll be tired of giving and giving to us? Or is it just tiresome that we have to ask every day?

It's nice if you lived most of your life in Yuma, Arizona (deemed the consistently sunniest place in the world, with an average of 11 hours of sunlight per day), but once you step off the plane and into life above the Arctic Circle for half the year, the darkness will still wear on you blanch your skin and darken your hair.

It's nice that I got my full 9 hours of sleep each night in elementary school, but those hours didn't roll over into my college late-nights when I was finishing a paper.

It’s nice that missionaries spend weeks at pre-field orientation, months itinerating, and years at language school, but pre-entry excitement never held anyone through the harsh and pride-crushing realities of living as a stranger in a foreign land.

We can’t produce what we don’t have on hand. We can only give what we’ve received. And the key to giving is receiving first.

We can’t keep giving gentle answers to turn away wrath if we’re not receiving God’s peace-loving wisdom (James 3:17-18).

We can’t keep extending love after being rejected if we’re not taking on Jesus’ attitude of not demanding His own rights (Philippians 2:5-7).

We can’t keep standing for the veracity of the Bible amidst a relativistic majority if we’re not being transformed by the renewing of our mind (Romans 12:2).

We cannot. Will not.

It’s inevitable that if we are not consistent, we will run dry. Banking can only last for so long. The process of asking, receiving, giving, and asking again is a process that never ends.

May we re-evaluate what is optional and what is necessary. May we distinguish between what is mandatory and what is only all the rage for today.

What do we truly need? We can't skimp on it, can't bank it, can't have it run over from the past when we feel lazy in the present.

The Lord doesn’t give luxuries—things that are nice but are optional, sparkling additions to make a good day a little better. He gives us necessities. Maybe sometimes we feel that everything He gives isn’t necessary because it some of it sounds out of our range of giftedness. Or maybe we think it all isn’t necessary simply because of how numerous His resources are—the staggering amount and unending supply are incomprehensible.  

-           -           -           -           -          

The sun’s coming up a little earlier now: today it rose at 10:03 and set at 18:23. I welcome the day when I actually need to wear sunglasses, when “sunrise” doesn’t mean that the sky changes from black to a lighter tint of grey. And although it won’t come up before 9 AM until March 1st, I know that it will rise minimally though consistently earlier until June 21st, the longest day of the year.

Whether you draw life and peace from consistency or hanker for adventure, maybe it’s time to let the effects of consistency take you by surprise. They may be brighter than you anticipated.